In any case, the problem of choosing the вЂњbenevolent dictator,вЂќ making sure he or she stays вЂњbenevolent,вЂќ and replacing her or him with an equally benevolent successor, is not an impossible and unimaginable paradox. A board can and ideally should go decades without taking any meaningful action. A classic corporate board meets four times a year and has zero power to manage the company-only to replace the CEO. Accountability is not management it needs the lightest possible touch. An accountable monarchy cannot be perfectly autocratic or perfectly accountable. There is an engineering tradeoff between autocracy and accountability. Still: is that the main reason they donвЂ™t? Yes, McDonaldвЂ™s (not affiliated with Kevin MacDonald) would face legal consequences if they started drugging their Hebraic guests. Sovereignty is a nontrivial variation on the conventional corporate-governance model, which seems to do an okay job of grilling trillions of rubbery burgers without any overt poisonings. I would argue that assuring the вЂњbenevolenceвЂќ of the вЂњdictator,вЂќ or as I would say the accountability of the sovereign CEO, is not as impossible as it looks. This gives fascism the toxic aftertaste which has brought it such a bad name, despite its well-known achievements in the areas of transportation, rocketry, uniforms, etc. Fascism needs a popular support base, and that base implies an opposite anti-base. Unfortunately the political engineering of fascism prevents it from working as well. Monarchy has nothing against any class of human beings-not even Yale graduates. Also, no one with eyes can say the current regime is doing a good job of nurturing and protecting any class of human beings-except, possibly, Yale graduates. Unfortunately, after the 20th century, this has to be said. The purpose of the government is to nurture and protect its human beings, all of them. Basically, salus populi suprema lex means everyone is a protected class. Support monarchy as the only realistic cure for the old liberal-conservative monopoly of power. If you are a (cultural) fascist, monarchy is the closest thing to your kind of fascism that is maybe possible today. Support monarchy as the radical cure for the liberal oligarchy of all fancy institutions. The oligarchy may be rotting, but it will not clean itself up. If you are a (cultural) conservative, liberalism is your enemy. Democracy is also your enemy, and fascism (populism) is democracy. Support monarchy as your defense against fascism and democracy. If you are a (cultural) liberal, fascism is your enemy. Some of these problems disappeared over time. It also had its merits and also its problems. Institutional oligarchy-centerless bureaucracy-was the 20th centuryвЂ™s alternative to fascism. Or you could like the way that power works now-this would make you not a populist political democrat (ie, a fascist, or at least a type of fascist), but an elitist progressive oligarch. (But donвЂ™t confuse it with monachism or monorchism.) Kids: to stop fascism, support monarchism. Historically, fascism is Sulla or Marius monarchism is Caesar or Augustus. Fascism is an inferior version of monarchism. In an age of democratic apathy, monarchism is the only alternative to fascism. Since I have been doing this for almost fifteen years and now my people are everywhere (do you know one? You must know one-but would he say?), I thought itвЂ™d be good to clarify the difference. I believe the best form of government, for America now and also for most places in most times, is a вЂњbenevolent dictatorвЂќ-an absolute (yet accountable) monarch or вЂњsovereign CEO,вЂќ governing autocratically under the simple, ancient principle of salus populi suprema lex.Д«ut lots of folks think IвЂ™m a fascist and are afraid of me. I am a monarchist (an absolute monarchist, not a costume monarchist). Sweet friends! Brothers and sisters! Zoomers and boomers!

Stitch era universal problems